News

UK Sustainable finance: regulating ESG ratings providers

""
""
On 14 November 2024, the UK government published its consultation response and draft legislation proposals to regulate ESG ratings providers.  Entities providing ESG ratings (however named) which are likely to influence investment decisions on particular financial products will need to be FCA authorised.  This will apply both to UK ratings providers and to overseas ratings providers who have business relationships with UK users.  The FCA has announced that the regime will be proportionate and in line with IOSCO’s Final Report on ESG Ratings and Data Product Providers. This note considers the scope of the new regulated activity, who it applies to and what exclusions are available.

Following a consultation on implementing a regulatory regime for ESG ratings providers in the UK which closed in June 2023, the government has published a Consultation Response, together with its proposals for the new regime and draft legislation implementing ESG ratings regulatory proposals.

The main features of the proposal are set out below.

ESG ratings providers will require FCA authorisation

The UK’s regulatory perimeter will be expanded to include a new regulated activity of providing ESG ratings.  As a result, any person based in the UK or overseas in certain circumstances who provides ESG ratings will need to be FCA authorised.

Scope of the new regulated activity

The proposed definition for the new activity is as follows:

"(1) Providing an ESG rating is a [regulated activity], where that rating is— 

(a) produced using an established methodology and a defined ranking system of rating categories, 

(b) made available by an ESG rating provider in accordance with paragraph (2), and 

(c) likely to influence a decision to make a specified investment, unless the ESG rating provider could not reasonably have expected the ESG rating to influence a decision to make a specified investment. 

(2) This paragraph applies where— 

(a) a rating is made available by an ESG rating provider located in the UK by any means; 

(b) a rating is made available by an ESG rating provider not located in the UK by way of a business relationship, including but not limited to a subscription or any other contractual relationship, with a person located in the UK."

The following defined terms are relevant to this definition:

  • ESG opinion” means an ESG rating involving substantial analytical input from an analyst, whether or not it is characterised as an ESG opinion.
  • ESG rating” means an assessment regarding one or more ESG factors, produced in the form of an ESG opinion, an ESG score or a combination of both, whether or not it is characterised as an ESG rating.
  • ESG rating provider” means an entity that produces and makes available ESG ratings.
  • ESG score” means an ESG rating derived from data and a pre-established statistical or algorithmic system or model, without additional substantial analytical input from an analyst, whether or not it is characterised as an ESG score.

The main points to note about the scope of the new regulated activity are as follows:

  • Providing an ESG rating will only be a regulated activity where the rating is “likely to influence a decision to make a specified investment”. In relation to this:  
    • A “specified investment” means an investment that is itself within the financial services regulatory perimeter – such as bonds, structured products and units in investment funds.
    • The phrase “make a specified investment” is not very clear, but appears to be aimed at something that influences an investor’s decision to buy or sell a specified investment (rather than, for example, influencing a decision by a regulated firm to manufacture a specified investment).
    • The wording has been drafted broadly, in order to capture situations where ratings providers might not know the exact end use for their ratings but would reasonably expect that the ratings would be used in connection with investment decisions. The Consultation Response says that examples of what the definition would potentially cover include (i) ratings that are used to inform asset allocation and portfolio construction and (ii) pre-initial public offering (IPO) ratings.
    • The provision of ESG ratings will only fall outside the definition if the ratings provider could not reasonably have expected the rating to influence a decision to make a specified investment. That puts the onus on ratings providers to show that they would not have expected their rating to be used in that way.
    • The Consultation Response says that it would be considered reasonable to expect that a provider’s knowledge of a link between its ESG rating provision and its use in specified investments or financial services decision making would be “ensured by best and sensible endeavour”. It is not clear exactly what this means, but the Consultation Response suggests that contractual relationships between provider and user could be one option for providers to consider. This may lead ratings providers and their users to include express provisions in their contracts regarding the uses to which the ratings can be put.
  • The phrases “established methodology” and “defined ranking system” are included for the specific purpose of capturing systematically produced assessments which methodically draw comparisons between several entities or products to produce ESG ratings. An “established methodology” is one involving techniques and procedures systematically utilised to identify, collect, analyse and interpret data in order to produce a rating.
  • The definition of “ESG rating” is intentionally broad, so that it applies regardless of whether an opinion or a score is provided. The Consultation Response says that the intention is to capture both general ESG ratings products (e.g. aggregate ESG ratings on corporates or funds) and specific ones (e.g. biodiversity or controversy scores).
  • The definition for the new regulated activity includes the concept that the ratings provider is making an “assessment” regarding ESG factors. This therefore excludes information where no assessment has been made. See further below in relation to the provision of ESG data.
  • The term “ESG ratings provider” means an entity that produces and makes available ESG ratings. In relation to this:
    • The sole activity of distributing an ESG rating (on its own and without any manipulation or alteration of the original rating) will not be in scope of the proposed regulated activity. This is a change from the original proposal, which would have captured both distributors and providers.
    • An ESG rating provider who produces ESG ratings and then distributes them via a third party will be captured by the regime (because they will have produced the ESG rating and made it available to the distributor).The distributor in this scenario is not captured, as they have only made the rating available – they have not produced it.
  • The test for whether the regime applies will be different for UK ratings providers and overseas ratings providers. According to paragraph (2) of the definition, all ratings made available by an ESG rating provider located in the UK will be in scope, regardless of whether that service is paid for or provided for free. If the ESG ratings provider is located outside the UK, however, the regime will only apply if the ratings provider has a “business relationship” with a person located in the UK.
  • The new regime will apply regardless of whether the rating is solicited or unsolicited.

ESG data

As expected, the government does not propose at this stage to include the provision of ESG data within the new regulated activity.  Only when ESG data undergoes an assessment will it be subject to the new regime. This approach is aligned with the EU’s proposed approach to ESG data.

The government will continue to monitor the ESG data market and international developments to assess whether further regulatory action is required.

Exclusions

There is an exclusion from the definition of the regulated activity when a person is providing an ESG rating in the course of carrying on another regulated activity.  This is known as the “regulated products and services exemption”.

The intention behind the “regulated products and services” exemption is that firms who are already authorised by the FCA will not need to apply for a separate permission to provide ESG ratings, provided that the ESG ratings it provides are not also provided as a stand-alone product or service. 

This exemption raises the question of whether there would be a different regulatory regime for authorised firms who can benefit from this exemption and other persons who cannot.  The government says that it supports the FCA reviewing its rules and guidance to ensure a level playing field between all firms producing ESG ratings.  This is likely to mean that, even if authorised persons can rely on this exemption, the rules that apply to them when they are producing ESG ratings in the course of their other regulated activities are likely to be the same as those that apply firms to that have to obtain authorisation.

There are also exemptions in respect of:

  • ESG ratings provided for use within the ratings provider’s group (provided that the ratings provider reasonably expects that the ESG rating will not be made available to a third party outside that group);
  • “private use” – i.e. where the ESG ratings provider is providing the rating pursuant to a contract with, and exclusively about, the person that the ESG rating relates to (provided that the ratings provider reasonably expects that the ESG rating will not be made available to a third party outside that person’s group);
  • ancillary non-commercial provision of ESG ratings – specifically as part of the activities of a journalist, academic or charity;
  • ratings provided by public bodies, central banks or international organisations; and
  • ESG ratings that are developed exclusively for accreditation or certification processes (provided that the purpose of the accreditation or certification is not to influence a decision to make a specified investment).

Territorial scope

The new regime is designed to capture not only UK-based ratings providers, but also any overseas firms who are providing ESG ratings to UK users by way of a “business relationship”.  This is intended to create a level playing field between UK and overseas providers.

An overseas ESG rating provider who makes their rating available to a UK user via a third party located outside the UK will also be in scope of the regulation.  This is in order to close a loophole whereby an overseas ESG ratings provider could seek to avoid regulation by producing an ESG rating that they then make available to a user in the UK via a separate distributor outside the UK. However, the overseas ESG rating provider in this scenario is only captured where they could reasonably have expected the ESG rating to be made available to a person located in the UK, whether via that separate distributor or another third party.  

As noted further below, the government is considering an alternative approach under which overseas ratings providers may be able to avoid the need for authorisation if, for example, the UK has put market access arrangements in place with the ratings provider’s home country.

Overseas firms may also be able to benefit from the “regulated products and services” exemption if they are authorised in the UK.  The Consultation Response also notes that there are situations in which overseas credit ratings agencies and overseas benchmark providers may be permitted to access the UK without the need for authorisation on the basis of them being subject to equivalent regimes in their home country.  The government is still considering its approach in relation to this issue.

The Consultation Response says that the FCA is considering its approach to overseas ESG ratings providers applying for UK authorisation.  This includes exploring whether, according to size, significance, or market impact in the UK, an overseas ratings provider would be expected to be incorporated in the UK – that is, to establish a separate legal entity in the UK and apply for that entity to be authorised, instead of being able to apply for authorisation for the overseas ratings provider itself.  

The Consultation Response also says that the FCA is continuing to reflect on the most appropriate approach for overseas ESG ratings provision, including whether the best means of achieving this would be via the existing Threshold Conditions guidance, or some other means and will engage with firms to inform its policy thinking.  This will form part of the FCA’s consultation on the firm-facing rules under the ESG ratings regime.

International alignment

The Consultation Response reported that the overwhelming majority of responses were in favour of international alignment.  The government has incorporated this into the UK’s regulatory regime by aligning definitions broadly with IOSCO’s definition of ESG ratings provision.

The FCA also intends to develop a regulatory regime that is informed by the IOSCO recommendations, aligning territorial approach with that of the EU where appropriate.

The role of the FCA

Once the legislation necessary to implement the new regime has come into effect, ESG ratings providers will need to apply to the FCA for authorisation (unless they can benefit from an exclusion).  

Prior to the FCA’s authorisation gateway opening, and following their policy development processes, the FCA will consult on draft rules and guidance for ESG ratings providers.  This will include additional rules for those existing authorised firms who wish to benefit from the regulated products and services exclusion.  While these firms will not require a separate permission to provide ESG ratings as part of an existing regulated product or service, the FCA will assess whether existing standards need to be enhanced, to help ensure a level playing field between all firms producing ESG ratings. The consultation will include a cost benefit analysis to assess their impact before being finalised.


Authored by Dominic Hill, Emily Julier, and Rita Hunter.

Next steps

According to the Consultation Response, the overall process of designing, developing and commencing the ESG ratings regulatory regime is expected to take approximately four years.  

The government is inviting technical comments on the draft legislation by 14 January 2025.  The legislation is expected to be laid before Parliament in early 2025 (subject to Parliamentary time).  

Following this, the FCA will develop and consult on policy proposals, building in feedback to finalise the ESG ratings regime.  Affected firms will then go through the authorisations process, with the regime ultimately going live at the end of the authorisation gateway. This timeline is stated to be subject to various factors, including the number of firms in scope of the regime. 

Our global Sustainable Finance & Investment group brings together a multidisciplinary global team that provides clients with best-in-market support.  We are following the development of ESG regulation in the UK, the EU and globally closely so please get in touch if you would like to discuss.

This note is intended to be a general guide and covers questions of law and practice. It does not constitute legal advice. 

 

Search

Register now to receive personalized content and more!