Hogan Lovells logo
  • Our people
  • What we do
    Sectors Practices Legal Tech
    • Aerospace and Defense
    • Automotive and Mobility
    • Consumer
    • Education
    • Energy
    • Financial Institutions
    • Insurance
    • Life Sciences and Health Care
    • Manufacturing and Industrials
    • Private Capital
    • Real Estate
    • Sports, Media and Entertainment
    • Technology
    • Transportation and Logistics
    • Corporate & Finance
    • Disputes
    • Intellectual Property
    • Regulatory
  • Case studies
  • Our thinking
    • All Our thinking
    • Comparative guides
    • Digital Client Solutions
    • Events and webinars
    • Podcasts
    News image_2

    Reflecting on President Trump’s first 100 days in office

  • ESG
  • Careers
Search Search
close
Search Search Search
lang-sel-icon English
  • Deutsch
  • English
  • Español
  • Français
  • 日本語
  • 中文
False
people-new
Mobile area
  • About us
    • Overview
    • Our history
    • Global management team
  • Where we are
    • Our locations
    • Law Firm Network
  • Media center
    • Media contacts
    • Press releases
    • Awards & rankings
  • Responsible Business
  • HL Inclusion
  • Alumni
LinkedIn
Youtube
twitter
Wechat
News

Employment in the news | March 2025

31 March 2025
st james park london
st james park london
wechat x linkedin
hogan-lovells-logo
Share by email
Enter email
Enter Subject
Cancel
Send
News
Employment in the news | March 2025
Chapter
  • Chapter

  • Chapter 1

    Full steam ahead
  • Chapter 2

    Neonatal care leave in force as planned
  • Chapter 3

    Ethnicity and disability pay gap reporting
  • Chapter 4

    Insight into misconduct and its relevance to an unfair dismissal claim

As the Employment Rights Bill made its way to the House of Lords with significant government amendments, Parliament approved the neonatal care leave regulations. The government issued a consultation paper on ethnicity and disability pay gap reporting.

Meanwhile, the Court of Appeal had comments on whether an employee’s lack of “insight” into misconduct made a dismissal reasonable. On the facts of the case, it didn’t. 

Chapter 1

1

Full steam ahead

expanded collapse

The Employment Rights Bill completed its House of Commons stages and is now in the Lords. It’s been heavily amended since the government introduced it, reflecting the outcome of consultations. The key changes include:

  • Applying the new right for zero and low hour workers to be offered a guaranteed hours contract to agency workers. The duty will be on the end user hirer in most cases. The provisions are extremely complicated and there’s limited detail about how they will work in practice.
  • Confirming that SSP for low paid workers will be paid at 80% of normal earnings if that is less than the normal flat rate.
  • Accepting the principle that employees should be entitled to bereavement leave after pregnancy loss. The government will amend the Bill to reflect this.
  • Adjusting the original proposals on collective redundancy consultation. If dismissals take place across different establishments, a higher threshold of dismissals will apply before consultation is triggered. The threshold will be set out in regulations.
  • Introducing record keeping obligations to show compliance with annual leave requirements in the Working Time Regulations.

Next steps

  • The Bill starts its Committee stage in the House of Lords on 29 April, so it seems likely that it will get Royal Approval before the summer recess.
  • Until the government publishes the detail in underlying regulations, we won’t have a clear picture of what employers might do to prepare.
  • Click here to watch Stefan Martin discussing the Bill with Hogan Lovells’ Director of Legislative Affairs, Nikki Da Costa.

Chapter 2

2

Neonatal care leave in force as planned

expanded collapse

Parliament has approved the regulations governing neonatal care leave and the right will come into force for parents of babies born on or after 6 April as planned. In broad terms, employees will qualify for a week of neonatal care leave for every complete week a baby spends in neonatal care, up to a maximum of 12 weeks. The neonatal care must begin within 28 days of birth. Neonatal care leave is a day one right, but neonatal care pay is subject to service and minimum pay requirements.

Next steps

  • You can read about the new right in more detail here and watch our Employment Bite about neonatal care leave here.
  • Employers should implement a neonatal care leave policy or amend existing family-friendly policies, as necessary.
  • Ensure that managers are aware of the new right, and in particular the fact that employees do not have to give advance notice that they will be taking the leave while their child is receiving neonatal care.

Chapter 3

3

Ethnicity and disability pay gap reporting

expanded collapse

The government is preparing an Equality (Race and Disability) Bill to extend existing gender pay gap reporting obligations to ethnicity and disability pay gaps. Before publishing the Bill, the government is consulting on the detail, including:

  • Requiring employers with 250 or more employees to report ethnicity and disability pay gaps against the existing metrics (mean and median pay gaps, bonus pay gaps and employee distribution by pay quartile) and reference dates;
  • Introducing an obligation to provide a breakdown of a workforce by ethnicity and disability, including the percentage of employees that choose not to disclose;
  • Reporting by reference to the ethnicity classifications used in the 2021 census and the Equality Act definition of disability; and
  • Mandating that for confidentiality reasons, each group being analysed should contain at least 10 individuals, which may mean aggregating different groups.

Next steps

  • The consultation closes on 10 June 2025.
  • Employers may want to comment on whether they should be required to prepare action plans outlining what they are doing to improve workplace equality for ethnic minority and disabled employees.

Chapter 4

4

Insight into misconduct and its relevance to an unfair dismissal claim

expanded collapse

Hewston v OFSTED was a straightforward unfair dismissal claim. Mr Hewston was a school inspector who was dismissed for touching a child on the head and shoulder during an inspection. There was no suggestion that there was any improper motivation behind his actions, which were described by the Court of Appeal as “a friendly act of sympathy and assistance” after a wet child entered the school having been caught in heavy rain.

The EAT, upheld by the Court of Appeal, found that the dismissal was unfair because Mr Hewston had not been told or warned that he might be dismissed for a single incident of touching that did not raise a safeguarding concern. It would not have been obvious to him that his conduct could lead to dismissal in the absence of a “no touch” policy or guidance.

That’s legally uncontroversial. The more interesting aspect relates to OFSTED’s view that Mr Hewston’s lack of insight into his behaviour – he had not accepted that he had done anything wrong – made the dismissal fair, even if the underlying misconduct did not merit dismissal.

The Court of Appeal said that normally an employee’s failure to show proper contrition or insight will not make it reasonable to increase the sanction. Disciplinary proceedings are not “conducive to calm self-reflection” and an employee may be reluctant to say they will not act in the same way in future if that implies guilt. Although there may be cases where a lack of insight poses a real risk that the employee will commit more serious misconduct in the future, this was clearly not the position here.

Next steps

  • Disciplinary managers should consider whether an employee should have realised that their conduct could lead to dismissal before deciding to dismiss.
  • If the answer to that question is no, think carefully before relying on the employee’s failure to show contrition or insight as a reason to increase the disciplinary penalty.

Authored by Ed Bowyer, Stefan Martin, and Jo Broadbent.

Contacts

bio-image

Ed Bowyer

Partner

location London

email Email me

bio-image

Stefan Martin

Partner

location London

email Email me

bio-image

Jo Broadbent

Counsel Knowledge Lawyer

location London

email Email me

View more

More on this topic

image1
News

Employment in the news | February 2025

26 February 2025

image1
News

Employment in the news | January 2025

29 January 2025

View more

left_arrow
right_arrow

Related topics

  • Employment
Load more

Related countries

  • United Kingdom
Load more

Related keywords

  • Employment
  • Employers
  • Employees
  • Employment rights bill
  • Neonatal
  • Dismissal
Load more

Articles you may be interested in

image_1
News

Employment in the news | April 2025

29 April 2025

image_1
News

UK government asks for input on equality law changes

09 April 2025

image_1
Insights and Analysis

Employment Rights Bill – the next legislative steps

28 March 2025

image_1
News

Employment Bite | Neonatal care leave

24 March 2025

image_1
News

Employment Bite | The Employment Rights Bill – collective redundancies

28 February 2025

image_1
News

Employment in the news | February 2025

26 February 2025

image_1
News

UK Court of Appeal provides guidance on freedom of expression in the workplace

13 February 2025

image_1
Insights and Analysis

Employment Horizons 2025

13 February 2025

image_1
News

Employment Bite | The Employment Rights Bill – fire and re-hire

06 February 2025

left_arrow
right_arrow

View more insights and analysis

arrow
arrow
"" ""
Digital Client Solutions
Empowering you to lead change through our digital solutions.
Learn more

Register now to receive personalized content and more!

 

Register
close
See benefits
Register
Hogan Lovells logo
Contact us
Quick Links
  • About us
  • Careers
  • Case studies
  • Contact us
  • HL Inclusion
  • Our people
  • Our thinking
  • Responsible Business
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Fraudulent and Scam Emails
  • Legal notices
  • Modern Slavery Statement
  • Our thinking terms of use
  • Privacy
  • RSS
Connect with us
LinkedIn
Youtube
Twitter
Wechat
Stay in the know

© 2025 Hogan Lovells. All rights reserved. "Hogan Lovells" or the “firm” refers to the international legal practice that comprises Hogan Lovells International LLP, Hogan Lovells US LLP and their affiliated businesses, each of which is a separate legal entity. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Subscribe to Our thinking
Connect with us
LinkedIn
Youtube
Twitter
Wechat